When I was eight-years-old, in an
attempt to distract me from the abysmally boring town that my mother
moved us to, my grandmother enrolled me in a ceramics class. The
class consisted of a handful of cute little old ladies clucking
busily while painting minimally and me sitting happily and quietly in
the corner.
Often my grandmother and I would fine
tune our creations in her living room (her newly built living room)
on a rickety old card table while watching Angela Lansbury solve
crimes that were painfully obvious to the average four-year-old.
During one of these creative sessions, my creation required the use
of school-bus-yellow paint. I cannot remember the piece, but I will
ALWAYS remember the color. I reached across the table and plucked
the color decisively and began turning the lid with the usual amount
of gingerly applied force. That failing, I tried a bit harder and
then harder in a fashion vaguely resembling wrestling an alligator.
In one spectacular jerk, the lid freed and the paint leaped from the
bottle in an arc and puddled in the brand new brown carpet.
I stood mortified in place,
back-dropped by a steady stream of accusations and peppered with
profanity. My little eight-year-old body froze, not knowing whether
I should seek witness protection or cleaning products. I scrubbed and
scrubbed on my hands and knees. To the day that the carpet was
changed in that room, my grandmother claimed that there was a faint
yellow cast to that particular region (nobody else could see it).
This last month, I traveled back to my
grandmother's home. The living room, incidentally, has been
recarpeted at least three times since the infamous yellow paint
incident. I am blissfully walking through the living room with a
pudding in my left hand when I hear the saccharin warning, “Don't
spill on the carpet, dear.” In disbelief, I turn to my beaming
grandmother and mutter, “I am 34-years old. I am sure that I can
handle not spilling.” To which she retorts without pausing for an
instant, “I am sure, but there was the yellow paint.” YELLOW
PAINT!?! (this particular piece of punctuation is my husband's
favorite. It is called an interrobang and is used to denote
expressive disbelief and loud exclamation. It is used quite
purposefully in this application.) It has been 26 years (TWENTY-SIX
YEARS!?!) and I am haunted and expected to be repentant about YELLOW
PAINT!?!
My young baby, just weeks past his
first birthday, proudly took up the yellow paint standard this
weekend. My grandmother has two recliners settled in her living
room, one for herself and one for my grandfather. Perched like
vultures above them are two overhead lamps, with their domes
teetering precariously on their spindly bases. In an accident
involving my grandmother's balance, or lack thereof, one of the lamps
was “bent double” and on Saturday afternoon a new one was
purchased. Sunday morning, my sweet one-year-old crawled behind one
of the chairs, gripped the base of the lamp with his dimpled fist and
proceeded to pull himself to a standing position. As his balance
steadied the lamp succumbed to gravity and tumbled head-first into
the window sill, shattering in a glittering explosion.
I apologized profusely and offered to
replace her newborn lamp. The offer was denied vehemently, and I
continued on about my day, soundly determined to make restitution. My
determination waned with the woeful mention of, “I guess I cannot
crochet today, (pausing for the dramatic sigh of a martyr), because
my new lamp is broken.” I might mention that the second lamp is
still standing strong and it was midday with no need for artificial
illumination. The resolve to make restitution diminished further with
the second mention (also containing the defeatist sigh). This same
resolve then abated, abbreviated, attenuated, curtailed, declined,
decreased, depreciated, died out, drained, dwindled, ebbed,
extenuated, faded, lessened, receded, reduced, tapered, tempered,
weakened, and finally vanished all together with subsequent sighs and
subsequent moanings.
The question remains. At what age can
you “bend double” a lamp without blame and without having to be
reminded TWENTY-SIX YEARS LATER, “Remember that one time when you
fell on your butt and broke that lamp?” Is my poor sure-footed
thirty-year old son going to be stopped from approaching lighting
fixtures with the heeding, “Yeah, but remember when you broke
Grandma's brand new lamp?”
To further illustrate this point, I
tell the story of my very responsible 11 year-old. My sweet husband
bought us both brand new e-readers and my son, the bibliophile,
benefited from familial trickle down economics. He has lovingly
doted on his new toy, so when the battery needed charging after our
long car ride, my husband kindly loaned my son his beloved new
e-reader. My responsible son gently pressed the button to awaken the
treasured technology, but to no avail. He pressed it again and
waited patiently and then turned to me helplessly. In a declaration
that I wish could be claimed as uncharacteristic, I mindlessly spout,
“Oh great, you broke it!”
HE BROKE IT!?! If my husband had
pressed the same button with the same pressure and the same
insistence as my sweet son, he would have quite emphatically shouted,
“Darn thing is broken!” But at age 11, HE broke it?
So when do YOU stop breaking things
and does technology begin breaking itself? Perhaps it is when the
ratio of your belongings is higher in favor of things you bought
yourself than in things that your parents gave you? Perhaps it is at
the age of your life when you know that YOU are going to have to
explain to the clerk at the refund desk why a knitting needle tangled
unyieldingly in the video player is a manufacturing defect (another
rant). Perhaps it was during puberty, I distinctly remember the
logical shift of blame from me to everyone else when I was that age.
I have decided for the sake of
simplicity to adopt dear hubby's doctrines on who broke things. He is
an equal-opportunity tyrant. If anybody else was holding, consuming,
using, glaring at, or thinking about his property when it
malfunctions, then THEY broke it. If he was engaged in any of the
above listed activities, it is an obvious case of technological
suicide.
No comments:
Post a Comment